First of all, we need a scenario involving a problem for us to solve. In this chapter, we are decision makers looking for the best site for our business. We are supplying stores in multiple settlements scattered in our study area. More precisely, in every seat of the administrative division, we have stores to supply. We are looking for a site appropriate for holding our logistics center (that is, warehouse). As we will build the center, we do not need existing infrastructure on the site, although it should be economically feasible to build on it, and large enough to hold our 1 km2 building with some loading area to load and unload supplies. For the sake of simplicity, the shape of the building is not important, we are flexible enough to conform to the chosen site. Last, but not least, we don't need a single site. We need a list of the most suitable sites from which we can choose the best one for our business. Summarizing and expanding the preferences, we can get a nice list of criteria as follows:
- The sites must be in our study area
- They should be as close as possible to every settlement we need to reach
- They should be as close to main roads as possible
- They should be empty, mostly flat, sites
- They should be large enough for the warehouse and the loading area
By translating these criteria to the language of our GIS model, we can create a more specific list, which is as follows:
- The validity extent of the analysis is our study area. We should only use data clipped to its bounds or clip the final result.
- The sites should be close to the mean point of the seats of administrative divisions in the study area. The closer, the better.
- They should be close to motorways and highways. Maximum 5 kilometers, but the closer, the better.
- They shouldn't overlap with forest areas, residential areas, industrial areas, and the like.
- The slope of the areas should be equal to or less than 10 degrees.
- The final areas should have at least an area of 1.5 km2.
Additionally, to fully satisfy the preference of economical feasibility, we should add the following criterion:
- They shouldn't reside in the 200 meters vicinity of rivers and lakes, but the farther, the better.